<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>New York Young Republican Club &#187; jobs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nyyrc.com/tag/jobs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nyyrc.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:54:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Unemployment Hits 10.2%</title>
		<link>http://nyyrc.com/2009/11/06/unemployment-hits-10-2/</link>
		<comments>http://nyyrc.com/2009/11/06/unemployment-hits-10-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William P.</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unemployment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyyrc.com/?p=2966</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From MarketWatch: The U.S. unemployment rate climbed to 10.2% in October, topping the 10% mark for the first time in 26 years, the Labor Department reported Friday. Nonfarm payrolls dropped by a seasonally adjusted 190,000 in October, bringing to total number of jobs lost in the recession to 7.3 million. It was the 22nd straight [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/unemployment-rate-hits-102-in-october-2009-11-06-83100">From MarketWatch</a>:</p>
<p><strong><em>The U.S. unemployment rate climbed to 10.2% in October, topping the 10% mark for the first time in 26 years</em></strong><em>, the Labor Department reported Friday. Nonfarm payrolls dropped by a seasonally adjusted 190,000 in October, bringing to total number of jobs lost in the recession to 7.3 million. <strong>It was the 22nd straight decline in payrolls&#8230;.The report was worse than expected. Economists surveyed by MarketWatch were forecasting a rise in the unemployment rate to 10%, with 150,000 lost payroll jobs.</strong></em></p>
<p>That&#8217;s the highest since 1983.<br />
I have been posting these numbers for the last 3 or 4 months here on our blog, and they are always &#8220;worse than expected.&#8221;  When you have an economically illiterate president, Treasury Secretary, and Fed Chairman, the public is left consoling itself with an alleged &#8220;number of jobs saved&#8221; from a huge spending stimulus bill.  And what of those jobs?  As Nobel Laureate and liberal luminary Paul Krugman <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/11/02/opinion/02krugman.html">points out</a>, many of them are public sector union jobs (i.e., teachers): &#8220;If you want to see the recovery act in action, visit a classroom: your local school probably would have had to fire a lot of teachers if the stimulus hadn’t been enacted.&#8221;</p>
<p>Ladies and gentlemen, the Obama/Biden recovery!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nyyrc.com/2009/11/06/unemployment-hits-10-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Saved or Created: The Real Voodo Economics</title>
		<link>http://nyyrc.com/2009/06/12/saved-or-created-the-real-voodo-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://nyyrc.com/2009/06/12/saved-or-created-the-real-voodo-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 04:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yaron</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stimulus]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nyyrc.com/?p=2583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Despite a net job loss of over 2 million since the beginning of 2009, President Barack Obama claims that his policies &#8220;saved or created&#8221; 150,000 jobs. I can&#8217;t help but laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh at this. Oh, wait&#8230; and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh&#8230; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Despite a net job loss of over 2 million since the beginning of 2009, President Barack Obama claims that his policies &#8220;saved or created&#8221; 150,000 jobs.  I can&#8217;t help but laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh at this.  Oh, wait&#8230; and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh and laugh&#8230; and laugh and laugh.  Okay, out of respect for those who lost their jobs I have to stop laughing!  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s why jobs &#8220;saved or created&#8221; is shameless rhetoric:</p>
<p>1. There&#8217;s no way to count the number of jobs &#8220;saved or created&#8221; by stimulus spending.  The way the Obama administration comes up with the 150,000 figure is to basically assume that x amount of government spending creates a y number of jobs and just declare it so.</p>
<p>2. The second reason is related to something I call the <i>Instant Billionaire Formula&trade;</i>.  I claim that with the <i>Instant Billionaire Formula&trade;</i>, anyone can become a billionaire, instantly!  Here&#8217;s how it works&#8230; ready?  Okay, write yourself a check for one BILLION dollars!  And presto, you&#8217;re a billionaire!  Of course, what I failed to mention to begin with is that applying the <i>Instant Billionaire Formula&trade;</i> costs a billion dollars (you just wrote yourself a check, remember?), so overall, your net worth really doesn&#8217;t change.  But if we just look at the positive side of things, then, wow, yes, you just became a billionaire!  Similarly, the government can create any number of jobs by taking money from someone and giving it to someone else for say, digging a ditch and filling it back up. But considering <a href="http://socialismdoesntwork.com/government-waste/" target="_blank" title="Why is government so wasteful?">government&#8217;s propensity for waste</a>, is there any net gain here?  How many jobs are lost due to the stimulus spending, which is money that needs to be somehow taken out of the economy before it&#8217;s put back in?  How productive are the jobs &#8220;saved or created&#8221; in relation to the jobs &#8220;forsaken or destroyed&#8221;?  These are questions we must answer before we can claim 150,000 were &#8220;saved or created&#8221; while the net job loss is in the millions.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure that if President Bush had tried the &#8220;saved or created&#8221; trick, he would have been ridiculed to no end.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://nyyrc.com/2009/06/12/saved-or-created-the-real-voodo-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

