Some observations about trade deficits:
ByWith today’s whopping trade deficit number that brought our 2005 trade deficit to over $700 billion, it’s only a matter of time for Democrats to start screaming.
How about though we make some observation about trade deficits?
First let me be clear that trade deficits don’t matter. Now I’m not talking about budget deficits, which is different than trade deficits that can become a problem. I’m talking about trade deficits, which is when a country imports more than it exports.
The interesting point about trade deficits is that there is no point in history that anyone can point too that shows where trade deficits wrecked an economy. However there are points in history that show when a country tried to slow the flow of goods into the country it hurt growth and led to a slowdown in the economy. This idea is the idea of Mercantilism, where you want to export as much as possible. One point in American history that showed stopping the importation of cheap goods was a disaster is the Great Depression. Every economist agrees that the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act, which raised tariffs on thousands of imported goods, started and extended the depression. Interesting note is that because of today’s current trade deficit we have Senators like Chuck Schumer calling for tariffs on goods from countries like China. I guess he missed that day in school when they went over Smoot-Hawley.
If we take a moment to dig into the numbers we see some interesting correlations. Currently the countries with the biggest trade deficits are the U.S., Britain, Spain, and Greece. Now if we look at their GDP growth rates we see that they are also currently some of the fastest growing developed nations. Now if we look at the two developed countries with the largest trade surpluses, Germany and Japan, we notice two countries that are barely growing. One has to ask if trade deficits are bad and surpluses good, then why with Germany’s $200 billion trade surplus (the largest in the world) are they not the world’s economic superpower? Another interesting correlation is that in the last year Japan has seen their growth rates increase and economy start to inflate again. During this time their trade surplus has actually started to shrink.
These are just my own observations and despite the lack of historical proof that trade deficits are bad democrats will still try to play politics, like Chuck Schumer and call for ridiculous policies. I think though they should look back at their pal Bill Clinton. When Clinton came into office our trade deficit was almost zero. If we recall Bill Clinton and his team put in place a strong dollar policy that they adamantly defended throughout his administration. That strong dollar policy allowed us to import cheaper goods from overseas that started the trend toward our record deficits today. So Democrats can’t blame Bush for today’s trade deficits without also pointing too Clinton. I personally wouldn’t be blaming either one of them.



















8 Comments
February 10th, 2006 at 10:54 pm
One of your weaker arguments Vertucci, but its fun watching you grasp at feeble arguments to justify every nightmare policy put forth by Bush.
Meghan XX OO
(who just saw today’s Gallup poll that has Bush at 41% approval and AP Poll today that has approval at 40% – no SOTU bump for as%hat in-chief.)
Worst. President. Ever.
February 11th, 2006 at 3:37 am
I don’t mind you playing devils advocate but if you’re going to respond, say something important. Give me a good analysis on the world’s trade imbalances not diarrhea of the mouth.
Explain why it’s a weak argument, why Germany with the largest trade surplus in the world has one of the slowest economies of any developed nation, why the constant growing of our trade deficit under Clinton wasn’t a problem but now under Bush is a travesty.
I make a comment about Hillary donating money to pro life Casey and you put forth a long written and well informed, I will say, opinion. Based on your comment with this post, it’s obvious you’re not as informed on this topic. When that happens, it’s ok, you don’t need to comment on everything. Stick to what you know, like the NARAL and let the rest be. I mean we get it, you hate Bush.
February 11th, 2006 at 9:29 pm
Typical misogynist Republican response. Women should stick to women issues and leave the economic stuff to the ego-laden Republican male.
Meghan XX OO
(Who thinks Vertucci must idolize Santorum and his book It takes a Family.)
February 11th, 2006 at 11:29 pm
Meghan,
I have to give you credit you really know how to spin. Someone should give you a job as a press secretary. You actually try to give the impression that I said women in general should leave economic issues to men when I said nothing of the such. I’ll try it again.
“Explain why it’s a weak argument, why Germany with the largest trade surplus in the world has one of the slowest economies of any developed nation, why the constant growing of our trade deficit under Clinton wasn’t a problem but now under Bush is a travesty.”
February 12th, 2006 at 3:23 am
If you only knew what I do for a living Vertucci you’d be scared.
Most of your arguments or observations are weak because you have no grasp of cause and effect.
Meghan XX OO
(Who knows Vertucci’s initial statement was misogynistic.)
February 12th, 2006 at 5:43 am
I just read your latest Intelligent Design post below in the great exploiters thread and it had me howling.
I let my boyfriend (the science teacher) read it and he just shook his head in amazement.
I nominate that post as the World’s Worst on this site to date. You sure topped yourself Vertucci.
Meghan XX OO
(Who loves her studly progressive boyfriend.)
February 12th, 2006 at 5:14 pm
Scared? I doubt it.
It’s funny how you sit here and attack Republicans and the President about all their supposedly hidden dirty secretes talking a big game while you hide behind the name ronreaganjr with a tag line of Meghan.
Unless you’re a covert agent for the CIA I don’t see any reason why you wouldn’t lay your cards on the table. Maybe it’s because you just have a weak hand.
February 12th, 2006 at 6:17 pm
I’ll be bored with this place in a week or so. Level of discussion is sub par at best and the novelty is wearing thin.
Meghan
(Who feels honored to be compared to the president as a secret holder Ha Ha Ha.)